ITProPortal is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more
Up until this year, PC buyers had very little choice for what kind of primary storage they got with their laptop, nettop, netbook, or desktop. If you bought a netbook or ultraportable, you likely had a solid-state drive (SSD) as the primary drive (C: on Windows, Macintosh HD on a Mac). Every other desktop or laptop form factor had a hard disk drive (HDD). Now, you can configure your system with either an HDD, SSD, or in some cases both. But how do you choose? We explain the differences between SSDs and HDDs, and walk you through the advantages and disadvantages of both to help you come to your decision.
The traditional spinning hard drive (HDD) is the basic non-volatile storage on a computer. That is, it doesn’t “go away” like the data on the system memory when you turn the system off. Hard drives are essentially metal platters with a magnetic coating. That coating stores your data and a read/write head on an arm accesses the data while the platters are spinning inside a hard drive enclosure.
An SSD does much the same job functionally (saving your data while the system is off, booting your system, etc.) as an HDD, but instead of a magnetic coating on top of platters, the data is stored on interconnected flash memory chips that retain the data even when there’s no power present. The chips can either be permanently installed on the system’s motherboard (like on some small laptops and netbooks), on a PCI/PCIe card (in some high-end workstations), or in a box that’s sized, shaped, and wired to slot in for a laptop or desktop’s hard drive (common on everything else). These flash memory chips differ from the flash memory in USB thumb drives in the type and speed of the memory. That’s the subject of a totally separate technical treatise, but suffice it to say that the flash memory in SSDs is faster and more reliable than the flash memory in USB thumb drives. SSDs are consequently more expensive than USB thumb drives for the same capacities.
Hard drive technology is relatively ancient (in terms of computer history). There are well known pictures of the infamous IBM 350 RAMAC hard drive from 1956 that used 50 24in-wide platters to hold a whopping 3.75MB of storage space. This, of course, is the size of an average 128Kbps MP3 file, in the physical space that could hold two commercial refrigerators. The IBM 350 was only used by government and industrial users, and was obsolete by 1969. Isn’t progress wonderful? The PC hard drive form factor standardised in the early 1980s with the desktop-class 5.25in form factor, with 3.5in desktop and 2.5in notebook-class drives coming soon thereafter. The internal cable interface has changed from Serial to IDE to SCSI to SATA over the years, but it essentially does the same thing: connects the hard drive to the PC’s motherboard so your data can be processed. Today’s 2.5in and 3.5in drives use SATA interfaces almost exclusively (at least on most PCs and Macs). Capacities have grown from multiple megabytes to multiple terabytes, an increase of millions fold. Current 3.5in HDDs max out at 4TB, with 2.5in drives at 2TB max.
The SSD has a much more recent history. There was always an infatuation with non-moving storage from the beginning of personal computing, with technologies like bubble memory flashing (pun intended) and dying in the 1970s and ’80s. Current flash memory is the logical extension of the same idea. The flash memory chips store your data and don’t require constant power to retain that data. The first primary drives that we know as SSDs started during the rise of netbooks in the late 2000s. In 2007, the OLPC XO-1 used a 1GB SSD, and the Asus Eee PC 700 series used a 2GB SSD as primary storage. The SSD chips on low-end Eee PC units and the XO-1 were permanently soldered to the motherboard. As netbooks and other ultraportables became more capable, the SSD capacities rose, and eventually standardised on the 2.5in notebook form factor. This way, you could pop a 2.5in hard drive out of your laptop or desktop and replace it easily with an SSD. Other form factors emerged, like the DIMM-like SSDs in the Apple MacBook Air, but today many SSDs are built into the 2.5in form factor. The 2.5in SSD capacity tops out at 1TB currently, but they’re undoubtedly going to grow as time goes by.
Both SSDs and HDDs do the same job. They boot your system, store your applications, and store your personal files. But each type of storage has its own unique feature set. The question is what’s the difference, and why would a user get one over the other? We break it down:
Price: SSDs are very expensive in terms of pounds per GB. As a guide, for a 1TB internal 2.5in drive of the same form factor, you’ll be paying about £90 for a HDD and a whopping £800 for an SSD. Other capacities are slightly more affordable but you get the idea. Since HDDs are older and more established, they will remain to be less expensive for the near future. Those extra hundreds may push your system price over budget.
Maximum and Common Capacity: As seen above, SSD units top out at 1TB, but those are very rare and expensive. You’re more likely to find 128GB to 500GB units as primary drives in systems. You’d be hard pressed to find a 128GB HDD in a PC these days, as 250GB or even 500GB is considered a “base” system in 2012. Multimedia users will require even more, with 1TB to 4TB drives a common sight in those high-end systems. While the (Internet) cloud may be a good place to share these files between your phone, tablet and PC, high capacity local storage is less expensive and you only have to buy it once.
Speed: This is where SSDs shine. An SSD-equipped PC will boot in seconds, certainly under a minute. A hard drive requires time to speed up to operating specs, and will continue to be slower than a SSD during normal operation. A PC or Mac with an SSD boots faster, launches apps faster, and has higher overall performance. Witness the higher test scores on laptops and desktops with SSD drives, plus the much higher scores and transfer times for external SSDs vs. HDDs. Whether it’s for fun, school, or business, the extra speed may be the difference between finishing on time or failing.
Fragmentation: Because of their spiral-like recording surfaces, HDD surfaces work best with larger files that are laid down in contiguous blocks. That way, the drive head can start and end its read in one continuous motion. When hard drives start to fill up, large files can become scattered around the disk platter, which is otherwise known as fragmentation. While read/write algorithms have improved, the fact of the matter is that HDDs can become fragmented, while SSDs don’t care where the data is stored on its chips, since there’s no physical read head. SSDs are inherently faster.
Durability: An SSD has no moving parts, so it’s more likely to keep your data safe in the event that you drop your laptop bag or your system is shaken about by an earthquake while it’s operating. Most hard drives park their read/write heads when the system is off, but they are flying over the drive platter at hundreds of miles an hour when they are in operation. Besides, even parking brakes have limits. If you’re rough on your equipment, an SSD is recommended.
Availability: Hard drives are simply more plentiful. Look at the product lists from Western Digital, Toshiba, Seagate, Samsung, and Hitachi, and you’ll see many more HDD model numbers than SSDs. For PCs and Macs, HDDs won’t be going away, at least for the next couple of years. You’ll also see many more HDD choices than SSDs from different manufacturers for the same capacities.
Form Factors: Because HDDs rely on spinning platters, there is a limit to how small they can be manufactured. There was an initiative to make smaller 1.8in spinning hard drives, but that’s stalled at about 320GB, since the MP3 player and smartphone manufacturers have settled on flash memory for their primary storage. SSDs have no such limitation, so they can continue to shrink as time goes on. SSDs are available in 2.5in laptop drive sized boxes, but that’s only for convenience, as stated above. As laptops become slimmer and tablets take over as primary web surfing platforms, you’ll start to see the adoption of SSDs skyrocket.
Noise: Even the quietest HDD will emit some noise when it’s spinning or the read arm moves back and forth, particularly if it’s in a system that’s been banged about or in an all-metal system where it’s been shoddily installed. Faster hard drives will make more noise than slower ones. SSDs make virtually no noise at all, since they’re non-mechanical.
Overall: HDDs win on price, capacity, and availability. SSDs work best if speed, ruggedness, form factor, noise, or fragmentation (technically part of speed) are important factors to you. If it weren’t for the price and capacity issues, SSDs would be the winner hands down.
As far as longevity goes, while it is true that SSDs wear out over time (each cell in a flash memory bank has a limited number of times it can be written and erased), thanks to TRIM technology built into SSDs that dynamically optimises these read/write cycles, you’re more likely to discard the system for obsolescence before you start running into read/write errors. The possible exception are high-end multimedia users like video editors who read and write data constantly, but those users will need the larger capacities of hard drives anyway. Hard drives will eventually wear out from constant use as well, since they use physical recording methods, but longevity is less of an issue if the HDD isn’t be carried about.
So, does an SSD or HDD (or a hybrid of the two) fit your needs? Let’s break it down:
We’ve been talking primarily about internal drives, but the same applies to external hard drives. External drives come in both large desktop form factors and compact portable form factors. SSDs are becoming a larger part of the external market, too, for the same reasons we’ve mentioned: i.e., road warriors will want an external SSD over a HDD if they’re rough on their equipment.
Back in the mid 2000s, some of the hard drive manufacturers like Samsung and Seagate theorised that if you add a few GB of flash chips to a spinning HDD, you’d get a so-called “hybrid” drive that approaches the performance of an SSD, with only a slight price difference with an HDD. All of it will fit in the same space as a “regular” HDD, plus you’d get the HDD’s overall storage capacity. The flash memory acts as a buffer for frequently accessed files (like apps or boot files), so your system has the potential for booting faster and launching apps faster. The flash memory isn’t directly accessible by the end user, so they can’t, for example, install Windows or Linux on the flash chips. In practice, drives like the Seagate Momentus XT work, but they are still more expensive and more complex than simple hard drives. They work best for people like road warriors who need large storage, but need fast boot times, too. Since they’re an in-between product, they don’t necessarily replace dedicated HDDs or SSDs.
In a dual-drive system, the system manufacturer will install a small SSD primary drive (C:) for the operating system and apps, while adding a large storage drive (D: or E:) for your files. While in theory this works well, in practice, manufacturers can go too small on the SSD. Windows itself takes up a lot of space on the primary hard drive, and some apps can’t be installed on the D: or E: drive. Some capacities like 20GB or 32GB may be too small for a Windows 7 install. In our opinion, 80GB is a practical size for the C: drive, with 120GB being even better. Space concerns are like any multi-drive system – you need physical space inside the PC chassis to hold two (or more) drives.
Last but not least, an SSD and an HDD can be combined on systems with technologies like Intel’s Smart Response Technology. SRT uses the SSD invisibly to help the system boot faster and launch apps faster. Like a hybrid drive, the SSD is not directly accessible by the end user; rather, it acts as a cache for files the system frequently needs (you’ll only see one drive, not two).
Smart Response Technology requires true SSDs, like those in 2.5in form factors, but those drives can be as small as 8GB to 20GB and still provide performance boosts. Since the operating system isn’t being installed to the SSD directly, you avoid the drive space problems of the dual-drive configuration mentioned above. On the other hand, your PC will require space for two drives, a requirement that may exclude some small form factor desktops and laptops. You’ll also need the SSD and your system’s motherboard to support Intel SRT for this scenario to work. All in all it’s an interesting workaround, and we’re sure to see SRT installed on performance PCs in 2012.
It’s unclear whether SSDs will completely replace traditional spinning hard drives, especially with shared cloud storage waiting in the wings. The price of SSDs is coming down, but still not enough to replace the TB of data that some users have in their PCs and Macs.
Cloud storage of any significant size isn’t free either: you’ll continue to pay as long as you want personal storage on the Internet. Home NAS drives and cloud storage on the Internet will alleviate some storage concerns, but local storage won’t go away until we have ubiquitous wireless Internet everywhere, including planes and out in the wilderness. Of course, by that time, there may be something better. I can’t wait.
Sign up below to get the latest from ITProPortal, plus exclusive special offers, direct to your inbox!
Thank you for signing up to IT Pro Portal. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
ITProPortal is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.
© Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.